GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, NCT OF DELHI & HARYANA 4TH FLOOR, IFCI ...

The Bombay High Court, in the case of Shrinivasa Realcon Private Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner Anti-Evasion Branch, addressed ...

Bombay High Court, in the case of Nirmal Lifestyle Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Others, granted interim relief ...

International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) has issued the “IFSCA (Capital Market Intermediaries) Regulations, 2025” to establish a regulatory framework for the registration, regulation ...

High Court that the trial court had erroneously allowed Raka Overseas’s request to summon a GST Department witness for the production of GST records related to RNT Metals without Raka Overseas having ...

The Rajasthan High Court quashed a prosecution sanction order against Fortune Infovision Pvt. Ltd., an e-commerce company, for a delay in depositing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS). The company had ...

ii. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in low, the Ld. CIT (Appeals) erred in accepting fresh submission from the assessee and not allowing the AO to examine the additional evidence ...

The Rajasthan High Court addressed a writ petition filed by Alkem Laboratories Limited against the Deputy Director of Income Tax (DDIT), CPC, Bangalore, concerning an intimation order under Section ...

Consequently, the Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition. However, the court granted Hardwyn India Limited the liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court, which would be the High Court of ...

The company and its directors, Chandra Devi Biyala, Anil Kumar Bagri, and Jay Prakash Mukhiya, are required to pay the reduced penalty within 90 days. The order also directs the company to rectify the ...

The core grievance raised by the petitioner, a practicing lawyer, is the imposition of a separate examination fee by the Bar Council of India in addition to the registration fee. The petitioner argued ...

This appeal by the assessee is filed under Section 66 (1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for calling in question the order dated 28.03.2024 passed by the respondent herein. 2. The appeal ...